- Home
- Departments
- City Secretary's Office
- City Elections
- 2025 Election Results
2025 Election Results
EARLY VOTING | ELECTION DAY | MAIL-IN BALLOTS | PROVISIONAL BALLOTS | TOTAL | % of VOTES | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAYOR | ||||||
| Jim Sweeney | 522 | 237 | 19 | 778 | 50.45% | |
| Jackie Rasco | 479 | 264 | 20 | 1 | 764 | 49.55% |
| CITY COUNCIL POSITION 2 | ||||||
| Jared Sessum | 517 | 237 | 24 | 778 | 52.29% | |
| J.P. Byers | 450 | 246 | 13 | 1 | 710 | 47.72% |
| CITY COUNCIL POSITION 4 | ||||||
| Angela Cervantes | 509 | 289 | 15 | 1 | 814 | 54.70% |
| Gary Johnson | 456 | 195 | 23 | 674 | 45.30% | |
| CITY COUNCIL POSITION 6 | ||||||
| Kyra Burton | 425 | 251 | 20 | 1 | 697 | 46.59% |
| Summer Sanford | 550 | 231 | 18 | 799 | 53.41% | |
| CITY COUNCIL POSITION 1 UNEXPIRED TERM | ||||||
| Tyler Kubena | 606 | 271 | 27 | 904 | 64.34% | |
| Christopher Hues | 318 | 174 | 9 | 501 | 35.66% | |
| PROPOSITION A - BOND: POLICE STATION | ||||||
| For | 403 | 169 | 20 | 1 | 593 | 38.71% |
| Against | 589 | 330 | 20 | 939 | 61.29% | |
| PROPOSITION B - BOND: MUNICIPAL POOL COMPLEX | ||||||
| For | 651 | 320 | 27 | 1 | 999 | 65.64% |
| Against | 334 | 176 | 13 | 523 | 34.36% | |
| PROPOSITION C - CHARTER: ARTICLE II, SECTION 2.01 “THE COUNCIL” | ||||||
| For | 770 | 412 | 36 | 1,218 | 82.19% | |
| Against | 187 | 73 | 3 | 1 | 264 | 17.81% |
| PROPOSITION D - CHARTER: ARTICLE II, SECTION 2.05 “VACANCIES, FORFEITURE, FILLING OF VACANCIES” | ||||||
| For | 817 | 425 | 31 | 1,273 | 85.55% | |
| Against | 145 | 60 | 9 | 1 | 215 | 14.45% |
| PROPOSITION E - CHARTER: ARTICLE II, SECTION 2.10 “RULES OF PROCEDURE” | ||||||
| For | 597 | 317 | 25 | 939 | 63.83% | |
| Against | 355 | 163 | 14 | 532 | 36.17% | |
| PROPOSITION F - CHARTER: ARTICLE IV, SECTION 4.04 “BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES” | ||||||
| For | 714 | 349 | 28 | 1,091 | 76.94% | |
| Against | 211 | 106 | 10 | 327 | 23.06% | |
| PROPOSITION G - CHARTER: ARTICLE V, SECTION 5.03 “ANNUAL BUDGET” | ||||||
| For | 787 | 405 | 32 | 1 | 1,225 | 85.07% |
| Against | 145 | 64 | 6 | 215 | 14.93% | |
| PROPOSITION H - CHARTER: ARTICLE V, SECTION 5.05 “EMERGENCY APPROPRIATIONS” | ||||||
| For | 750 | 372 | 33 | 1 | 1,156 | 79.89% |
| Against | 184 | 101 | 6 | 291 | 20.11% | |
| PROPOSITION I - CHARTER: ARTICLE VI, SECTION 6.01 “PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION” | ||||||
| For | 677 | 315 | 27 | 1 | 1,020 | 71.28% |
| Against | 255 | 145 | 11 | 411 | 28.72% | |
| PROPOSITION J - CHARTER: ARTICLE VI, SECTION 6.04 “POWERS AND DUTIES” | ||||||
| For | 821 | 399 | 36 | 1 | 1,257 | 87.29% |
| Against | 117 | 64 | 2 | 183 | 12.71% | |
| PROPOSITION K - CHARTER: ARTICLE VIII, SECTION 8.05 “FORM OF AFFIDAVIT, COMMITTEE OF PETITIONERS” | ||||||
| For | 562 | 319 | 27 | 908 | 63.85% | |
| Against | 360 | 143 | 11 | 514 | 36.15% | |
| PROPOSITION L - CHARTER: ARTICLE VIII, SECTION 8.08 “FILING AND EXAMINATION OF PETITIONS” | ||||||
| For | 807 | 395 | 34 | 1 | 1,237 | 86.26% |
| Against | 124 | 68 | 5 | 197 | 13.74% | |
| PROPOSITION M - CHARTER: ARTICLE IX, SECTION 9.02 “JUDGE OF THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF RECORD” | ||||||
| For | 698 | 337 | 31 | 1,066 | 76.20% | |
| Against | 215 | 112 | 6 | 333 | 23.80% | |
| PROPOSITION N - CHARTER: ARTICLE IX, SECTION 9.04 “COSTS, PROCESS, AND PROCEDURES IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF RECORD” | ||||||
| For | 729 | 339 | 34 | 1,102 | 79.05% | |
| Against | 178 | 110 | 4 | 292 | 20.95% | |